1000 web dates an in-the-trenches view of dating and relationships today

19Jun/081

What If He’s Only Had Friends with Benefits?

So the Farmer lives about 1.5hrs South of me (I think), but he doesn't see that as a stumbling block to dating. I thought to myself, if he doesn't think its that big a deal, why should I? So we chat. Still. Often. Usually twice a day.

I was curious as to what he wanted to get out of our MSN-based interactions, because most men I've talked to online seem to want to meet right away. Which has always been fine by me, because I'm not a fan of chatting forever, falling in love online and THEN meeting face to face. Nah, too many expectations. I'd rather get the whole picture as soon as possible, and I'd much rather have my relationships exist in flesh and bloody goodness.

The Farmer, on the other hand, would much rather chat and get to know each other at length before meeting. His reasoning? (You already know, c'mon now... its always a dating disaster story). A psycho first date with a woman who basically started stalking him afterwards. She didn't even post a picture of herself online, but rather someone else. (Her sister? Roommate? I can't remember).

Curious, I ask more about the Farmer's dating experiences. He seems to have a fairly dark view of meeting women online (understandably), and rarely find people he even finds remotely interesting. Lucky me, I passed the first few tests.

And then he drops The Whopper For Which I Was Not Prepared: he isn't fond of dating. In fact, his last two "relationships" were friends with benefits situations that lasted a "long long time".

I fumbled around for words after his admission, and ended up signing off earlier than normal to think a bit.

I hate friends with benefits. Truly hate it. Boots to those who can make it work without hurt feelings, but I have yet to see or experience a 'successful' FWB first-hand. And if it isn't already obvious, I'm sore on the subject because I've been made a friend with benefits a few times without being told.

Here's what bugs me: FWB is basically a cop-out to avoid actual intimacy with another human being. Something is being filled (literally!) but the actual joy of intercourse is being thrown out the window completely. Its the same reason why I don't enjoy sex doggy-style; I cannot connect with my partner. What irks me even more are the men who have FWB relationships exclusively. They are essentially emotionally unavailable (as opposed to emotionally distant), and that's definitely NOT what I am looking for.

So do I keep on talking to this guy, knowing he's already told me what I need to know?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

8Feb/080

Decisions, Decisions. Do I Keep My Mouth Shut?

I have an ex from hell. Okay, I may be exaggerating just a wee bit there. What do you call a man who betrayed you in the worst way possible not once, but thrice? Anyway. I'm thankful there is only one of him.

I've been advised said Ex-from-Hell (EfH) is moving in with his newest gal pal, who he just recently met while his last girlfriend was still pregnant with his kid. (Like I said, he's a real winner. What was I thinking?!) Unfortunately, EfH's gal also has a child of her own.

I realize there are many problems with this scenario already. Why do I know this? Why do I care? But let's ignore that for the time being. Here's my dilemma: EfH is still trolling the dating sites, specifically freebie OkCupid.com. Frequently. With a profile that says he's childless, single, recently out of a long-term relationship so he's "not looking", but eventually would like "...a woman I not only want, but need". Funny, he used that line on me once.

EfH may say that he's only on the site for the tests. Which would be believable, since OkCupid focuses specifically on user-generated tests to determine compatibility. Problem is, EfH's number of questions answered and compatibility markers haven't changed. For well over a year, maybe longer.


lavalife dating offer

Now normally, I wouldn't care. Normally I'd feel a twinge of sadness that he still hadn't grown up and was putting more innocent people through a hell of their own. And then I'd stop the thought process and move on, knowing (from experience) that the only way EfH could attract anyone new was if the person in question had very little self-esteem or self-respect. No one is going to take care of us if we can't first take care of ourselves.

But I digress. Do I keep my mouth shut? Would you? Advice people, advice! There are kidlets involved here.

Subscribe to 1000 web dates

20Mar/072

On Why I Used to Love Lavalife [Lavalife Review]

About five years ago, I met a guy through CasualKiss (a free dating site geared towards the under 35 set) who advised me "Lavalife is a lot better". At the time I wasn't partial to the paid dating sites, as few were heavily populated in Canada at the time. But recommendations go a long way in my world, so I decided to sign up and see what happened.

I was, in a word, overwhelmed.

Where CasualKiss offered me a couple of responses and hello's a week, Lavalife gave me hundreds upon hundreds in mere hours. Chat requests, messages and winks came at me from all three of their sections (dating, relationships and my personal favorite, intimate), and mostly from people within a 100 mile radius. I remember spending more than a day just sending out, "Thanks but no thanks" copy and pastes to everyone who had taken the time to say hello, but quickly gave up when I realized that replying meant somehow I was interested, even if the communication stated something different.

Instead, I slowly worked my way through every message, wink and chat, looking for something unusual to grab my attention. No picture? Erased. Bad grammar or spelling that was beyond my basic tolerance levels? Gone. Not within driving distance? Sorry dude. Over 20 years my senior? Not going to happen. I even changed my profile to explicitly state, "I'm not looking for a Daddy, thanks."

Still, the responses flowed faster than I could keep up and within a week I had to take a break. In the five years since I still haven't received anything quite as intense as what I received my first week on Lavalife (affectionately referred to as Lava).

Eventually the surge lifted, and I was able to thinkabout the entire process, and realized: I haven't paid a penny to Lavalife yet, and it's not a free dating site. Meet revelation #2: Lavalife is free for those in demand, as only the pursuers need to pay for credits to contact others.

With this newfound information, I was even more impressed with the site, although I did feel a tad dirty knowing men were paying merely to say hello to a picture and profile. I finally came to the conclusion it was no different than some guy sending a drink my way at the bar to get an introduction, so I left it at that.

Several months later and a couple dozen dates under my belt, I was hooked on Lavalife. I later learned it was the top online dating site in Canada (according to ComScore Media Matrix), with more than five million views a month. It had an adequate number of people, lots of fun features, and the ability to openly state exactly what I was looking for. Score!

That's when Revelation #3 hit me on the head: the intimate section was where it was at. In my personal experience the Relationship folks were looking to get married, fast (going so far as to propose on the first, second or third date more times than I can remember). The Dating dudes were usually looking for intimate encounters but knew few women would openly say so themselves at the time, so they hunkered down in the next best space. A select few were more Relationship oriented, but again, they went where the women were. Less than 1% of the men I met with or spoke to on Lavalife actually wanted to just date.

The intimate section was also where people seemed to loose their inhibitions, and not just the sexual ones. Anything and everything was fair game over there, including politics, religion, alternative lifestyles and odd social news. My favorite people (and now close friends) were all found over in intimate.

But this is all old news.

Perhaps I'm not in love with Lavalife as much as I used to be because the market share has decreased, or maybe I don't have the same social currency as I did in my mid-twenties. Either way, Lavalife doesn't seem anywhere near as exciting anymore. I rarely get messages (even living in a city of more than a million people), and the few I do border on downright creepy. One recent contact asked to meet me in a secluded area, devoid of any contact information or pictures "just for the hell of it".

The intimate section has lost its luster as well. All I seem to find over there now are lusty men looking to get their members wet with little interest in the person on the other side of the interaction. Now, there's nothing wrong with lusty in my world, but I'd much rather some sort of intellectual attachment even if there isn't an emotional one.

I still don't regret my Lavalife days; I met thousands of people through the site. (Now there's a feature I'd like - one that chronicles all the people I met!) I've even had several friends ask, "How many people do you know that you didn't meet on Lavalife?" and I'm usually hard pressed to find someone, anyone, that doesn't have even a cursory attachment to the site.

Still, Lavalife hasn't changed much in the past few years, so I'm looking to fill it's social gap in my life.

11Mar/070

Looking for a Spring Break Fling? Then Head On Over to True

It's no surprise to me that online daters are looking for more nooky than love - that's why sites like AdultFriendFinder have done so well for so long. But when statistics from the largest online dating site (according to the most recent Top 10 Dating Sites in the U.S. post) prove it?

Okay, I'll admit it: I was a bit surprised that online dating users had become so honest about their spring break fling wants.

True asked just over five hundred of their users this month what they were looking for relationship-wise on their spring break this year: friendship, casual dating, a spring break fling, long-term relationship, or marriage. A full thirty percent answered they were looking for a spring break fling, with a close twenty-nine percent opting for casual dating.

"Dating is all about where you are in your life,"

said TRUE's relationship expert and profile coach in a recent press release.

"I think that many people make the assumption that because someone joins a dating site, they're ready to settle down. But we know that many of our members are in a stage of their lives where they simply want to date around and explore relationships with other singles."

Although the sample group was small, the results do share a lot about True's users, of whom eighty-six percent said they'd be open to dating someone long-term they met after having a spring break fling with them.